6 Reasons Why the MIT Blackjack Team Became Entrepreneurs

Reposted from Xconomy.com

Wow. Imagine being invited to moderate a free-form discussion with the people who lived out the book “Bringing Down the House” and the movie “21.” It doesn’t get any better than this.

At Xconomy’s XSITE conference last week, I had the honor of moderating a reunion panel of the MIT Blackjack Team with two of the original members (Bill Kaplan and Jon Hirschtick) and two (Neelan Choksi and Semyon Dukach) who reconstituted the team in 1992. The team is known for its sophisticated card-counting techniques that outsmarted many casinos during the 1980s and 1990s.

There were many great stories, but what stuck with me was that so many members of this famous team went on to found companies. Much like the propensity of lacrosse “bros” to end up on Wall Street and have successful careers, many blackjack team members found a common career in entrepreneurship. This surprised me because I thought a hedge fund manager (a path that some did choose) would be a better match for their skill set than the entrepreneurial option. But the panelists explained that there were six key reasons why many team members became entrepreneurs:

1. Team: It was the MIT Blackjack Team, not a collection of individuals. The whole was so much more than the sum of the parts. Creating a high-performance team that could accomplish seemingly impossible things gave them an adrenaline rush more than money did. Likewise, entrepreneurship is fundamentally a team sport, not an individual one, as MIT research has shown.

2. “De-Risking” Risk Taking and Making it Work for the Team: Every panelist said they would never play a game like roulette or the slot machines. They had no interest in random risk.  Instead, they would play games where they could influence the outcome by exploiting a knowledge asymmetry. If they took a risk, it would be because the odds were in their favor due to their hard work. This is precisely the mentality that a successful entrepreneur needs.

 

Read the rest of the article here